Could I have Arthritis or maybe something else?
for last 8 months or so I've noticed feet, ankles, wrists and hands really bothering me (my hands more than anything though). And it's gotten much worse these last 3 months since I started working full time and using my hands a lot more. I don't know how to describe how they hurt, I guess like an aching feeling, like growing pains might feel or something. They bother me a lot at night and make it hard to sleep. Also, when I wake in the morning my hands are locked, and it's very painful to get them moving. They'll also lock when I'm driving, or sometimes if I'm just not doing anything with them, like laying in bed watching tv. I'm 21 so I don't know how likely arthritis is, but I do know that my grandma, great grandma, and great great grandma all have/had arthritis (i'm unsure which kind). My mom doesn't have arthritis. So basically I'm wondering if this sounds more like arthritis or possibly something else. And if it does sound like arthritis, how soon do I need to see a doctor? I don't get health insurance for another 9 months or so, so I can pay out of pocket if I have to but I don't know how urgent it is that I get it checked out. Thanks.

Get the answers

Will the army pay my rent?
I'm an e1 and I am married with one kid Do we all get health insurance? Does the army pay rent? I heard that I wasn't allowed to move out of the barracks intill I was an higher rank is this true?? im not married yet but i will be after i finished my bct and ait does this matter?

Get the answers

why do republicans think Obama's health care policy is unconstitutional?
We are discussing this in our political science class in high school, and I'm a bit confused, as I don't see or have a problem with this issue at all. I have no problems being forced to get health insurance, given the fact that not having insurance was the #1 reason people go bankrupt. I think its absolutely reckless for people to go on without health insurance, not to mention it may lower premiums if more people are paying monthly. I understand the democrats' logic (that govt could and should force people to do things for their own good), but I can't see the republican logic in opposing it. A govt can't force people to do things, but we already are forced to do a lot of things we don't like. And why do they not support this, but are trying to force govt to ban gay marriages and teaching evolution? In a way, are republicans saying govt can't force you to do something, but govt can force you to NOT do something? I mean no disrespect. I'm new to politics and relate more to the democrats at this point. I'm just trying to understand the all-encompassing logic republicans have on this issue.

Get the answers